CHARLES RIVER FLOATING WETLAND
  • Home
  • Current Research
  • Water Quality
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Current Research
  • Water Quality
  • About Us
Search

Understanding the Health of the River


Improving Letter Grades

“Today rowers will hope not to get to get wet, but if we work hard and invest wisely, a decade from now they’ll be able to go for a swim at Magazine Beach after the race.”
         - John P. DeVillars, EPA New England Administrator, 1995.
Picture
In 1995 the U.S. EPA set a goal of achieving a swimmable and fishable lower Charles River basin by 2005. Over the last 20 years, bacterial water quality has improved each year. This progress can be largely credited to the near elimination of combined sewage overflow (CSO) into the lower basin. Today, the river is largely improved. In 2017 and 2018 the river earned an A-, meaning that it meets E. coli based standards for swimming 70% of the time.
​
Source: EPA-Charles River Initiative, MWRA-CSOs and the Charles 

To understand trends along the river read the CRWA's water quality reports.
For a detailed break-down of swimmability at North Point Park you can read our executive summary.

Harmful Algal Blooms

Unfortunately the EPA letter grades don’t tell the whole story. Each summer blooms of toxin-producing cyanobacteria exceed the thresholds for recreational water.

​Since 2009 the Massachusetts Department of Public Health has posted 11 advisories, restricting recreational activity on the river for an average of 48 days each year. These blooms are visible as peaks in turbidity and phycocyanin on data plotted from the EPA’s Charles River Buoy.

​Source: EPA-Charles River Buoy

Nutrient Pollution and Eutrophication

In 2007 the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and the EPA drafted a plan to control harmful blooms by limiting the amount of phosphorous entering the river. Chlorophyll a, a measure of algal biomass, was chosen as a surrogate water quality target.
Picture

While these efforts have succeeded in reducing nutrient concentrations, no change is observed in algal growth.  Summer Chlorophyll concentrations remains elevated above the target levels indicating excessive algal growth, characteristic of a eutrophic condition. 

Source: Lower Basin Nutrient TMDL, MWRA-sampling data

Can Floating Wetlands Improve Water Quality?

​This installation is designed to test the theory that enhancing in-river habitat can contribute to the control of harmful algal blooms by shielding zooplankton from the predatory pressure of small fish. We hope that the floating wetland will have a measurable local effect of shifting the distribution of zooplankton from predominantly smaller bodied animals like rotifers, to larger “micro-crustaceans” like copepods and daphnia.
Picture
We are currently collecting preliminary data as part of a three year study monitoring changes in zooplankton density, relative abundance, and mean body size. Data and preliminary findings will be presented to the public during each year of the study.
  • Home
  • Current Research
  • Water Quality
  • About Us